Difference between revisions of "Release Meeting Minutes/2007-12-17"
(New page: Weekly release meeting 2007-12-17 15:30 EST attending: * hartmans * kpkoch * tlyu * raeburn * lxs * jander * Will Fiveash Sam: My understanding that steve is getting PPM accounts for [Wi...) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{minutes|2007}} |
||
Weekly release meeting 2007-12-17 15:30 EST |
Weekly release meeting 2007-12-17 15:30 EST |
||
Latest revision as of 22:49, 3 January 2011
Weekly release meeting 2007-12-17 15:30 EST
attending:
- hartmans
- kpkoch
- tlyu
- raeburn
- lxs
- jander
- Will Fiveash
Sam: My understanding that steve is getting PPM accounts for [Will] and Wyllys.
Sam: responses to chinese stuff [venustech]
Sam: kfw and mechglue ... main risks
Sam: for Tom ... get you time or contractor etc.
Sam: Kevin - breakthrough or something?
Kevin: yes. ... Jeff says watch out for how you name endpoints ... history... why not take code that generates endpoints and use existing code for generating endpoint names
Sam: move into library? ... good idea.
Kevin: copied out into separate area and made sure can compile
Sam: before you check in anything, actually move the code. not be a state where you've got both sets of code still live. first things you should actually do is move code into ccapi library.
Kevin: done
Sam: moving code out of old ccapi lib into new one. when you make change to kfwlogon, have ccapi server working enough that you can stop building old code. old code will work w/o kfwlogon.
Sam: gut feeling - treat your [Kevin] delay as estimate error for now; if still in bad position 4wks from now then look more closely. reasonable?
Kevin: yes
Sam: other stuff to discuss?
Tom: handoff for multi mkvno?
Sam: assume Will hasn't yet gotten time to look at it
Will: correct ... still struggling with workstation, hw probs, etc.
...
Will: intial focus on enctype migration; multi mkvno is related?
Tom: yes