Difference between revisions of "Projects/KREALM"

Revision as of 03:50, 15 September 2015

This project introduces Kerberos description records in DNS. At present, there is no formally acceptable manner of deducing a realm name from a server name. The KREALM record enables such translations, and possibly more. The record's security hinges on DNSSEC.

External project links:

• Specification

We use KREALM as a name for the protocol proposed on this page.

Mechanics of the Project

Actors: The Kerberos actor wanting to establish the realm name for a given server name is called the DNS client. The server name is supported by a DNS zone run in a DNS server.

1. The DNS client requests the KREALM record for the sought server name, or otherwise a denial by the DNS server.
2. The DNS client validates the response or denial through DNSSEC.
3. We dropped the following, as we couldn't agree on it: The DNS client may retry at a default location (usually the apex of the DNS zone) based on the location for a DNSKEY signing a denial.
4. The DNS client will validate any such default location to be the same or a higher-up name in the DNS hierarchy.
5. The DNS client interprets the KREALM record to find the realm name
6. When multiple KREALM records exist, then each suggests an alternative realm name to try

It should be pointed out that rogue intermediates might add RRSIG records of their own, pointing to parts outside the DNS hierarchy for the requested server name. This should be detected and ignored.

The DNS client mentioned above will usually be the KDC, which may be assumed to be setup to validate DNSSEC properly. For clients, this is less likely, less reliable and may fail in various contexts due to mediocre DNS infrastructure at end points. Having said that, a client that loads its own libunbound or other secure resolver may still succeed on most networks.

Past Controversy

The default location has been subject of some controversy. This was because:

• The DNS does not formally define where a zone apex lies;
• Iterating upward may land up in a DNS zone under different operational control;
• Iterating upward is not an efficient use of the DNS.

These points kept coming up, and so we have decided to not iterate upward along the DNS hierarchy at all. Every server that wants to specify a Kerberos realm should set it up alongside the servername.

Policy Choices for this Mechanism

• The KDC may or may not want to find realms through KREALM records
• The client, provided that it can process DNSSEC, may want to find realms through KREALM records
• The client, if it doesn't process KREALM records itself, may delegate to the KDC by accepting canonicalisation and Cross-Realm Routing suggestions
• The server administrator may or may not choose to publish the realm, and possibly more, for the service and/or the realm

Changes to Kerberos

• The KDC may process KREALM records, and for that purpose, rely on DNSSEC
• The Kerberos client might process KREALM records, and for that purpose, require DNSSEC to be operational (which may not be completely reliable on all client networks)

Changes to DNS

• DNS servers would need to support KREALM records, as they do any other records
• Until they do, Handling of Unknown DNS RRtypes can be used

Comparison to Other Work

None.

Related Projects

See KREALM-XOVER.

Specifications

None.